Liu Long was an emperor of the Tang Dynasty who implemented a series of reforms during his reign, resulting in relatively stable national politics and a certain degree of socio-economic development. However, he ultimately passed away due to some reasons. There are different opinions in history about who his next successor will be.
Firstly, we need to understand Liu Long’s life background. According to historical records, Liu Long was born in 712 AD as the son of Emperor Xuanzong of Tang and the nephew of Emperor Suzong of Tang. During his reign, he implemented a series of reforms, such as strengthening centralization, reforming the official system, and reducing tax burdens, which made the country’s politics relatively stable and the socio-economic development to a certain extent. However, he eventually passed away due to some reasons.
Secondly, we need to consider the question of who Liu Long’s next successor will be. There is no clear consensus in history on who Liu Long’s next successor will be. Some historians believe that after his death, his son Li Yu succeeded him as the new emperor. But there are also some historians who hold different views. They believe that there were some problems during Liu Long’s reign, and his governance style was not appropriate, so his next successor should be a more capable person to inherit his throne. These views have also not received sufficient support and recognition.
Finally, some historians argue that it is not important who Liu Long’s next successor will be. The important thing is that some of the reform measures he implemented during his reign had a profound impact on later history. Although he has some issues, his historical status should be objectively evaluated.
In short, there have been different opinions in history regarding who Liu Long’s next successor will be. We should objectively evaluate based on historical data and not draw conclusions easily. Anyway, we should recognize that Liu Long is a historical figure with his own characteristics, and his historical status should be objectively evaluated.
